Bazley v. Price

Filing 30

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/25/2020 ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations in full. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The court DECLINES to issue certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BAZLEY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-02673-TLN-AC v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILATION, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 22 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 29.) Neither 24 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 /// 1 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 15, 2020 (ECF No. 29), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 3 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and 4 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 5 2253. 6 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: August 25, 2020 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?