Young v. Qureshi

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/1/2017 DENYING without prejudice 35 Motion for Leave to Amend. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNY GEROME YOUNG, 12 13 14 No. 2: 15-cv-2674 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MUHAMMAD QURESHI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 23, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff’s 20 motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a prisoner, 21 plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis 22 statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Because plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint, 23 the court is unable to evaluate it. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 23, 2017 motion for 25 leave to amend (ECF No. 35) is denied without prejudice. 26 Dated: November 1, 2017 27 28 Yo2674.ame 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?