Young v. Qureshi
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/29/2018 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANNY GEROME YOUNG,
12
13
14
15
No. 2: 15-cv-2674 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MUHAMMAD QURESHI, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this
19
action should not be dismissed as moot.
20
This action proceeds on the amended complaint filed February 16, 2016. (ECF No. 5.)
21
Named as defendants are Dr. Qureshi, Dr. Singh, Jackie Clark, N. Atienza and A. Abu. All
22
defendants are located at the California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) in Stockton, California.
23
Plaintiff was incarcerated at the CHCF when he filed the amended complaint. Defendants
24
Qureshi, Singh, Atienza and Abu have filed a summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 44.)
25
Defendant Clark has not yet been served with process.
26
In the amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that he received inadequate medical care while
27
housed at the CHCF. In the amended complaint, plaintiff seeks injunctive relief only (i.e. no
28
monetary damages). (See ECF No. 5 at 8-11.)
1
1
Plaintiff is now housed at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). (ECF No. 48.) When
2
an inmate seeks injunctive or declaratory relief concerning the prison where he is incarcerated, his
3
claims for such relief become moot when he is no longer subjected to those conditions. See
4
Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 149 (1975); Dilley v. Gunn, 64 F.3d 1365, 1368-69 (9th
5
Cir. 1995). Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be
6
dismissed as moot.1
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this
8
order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot.
9
Dated: November 29, 2018
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants’ summary judgment motion addresses the merits of plaintiff’s claims. (See ECF
No. 44.)
2
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?