Pierce v. Sacramento Business Journal, et al.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/17/16 ordering that plaintiff shall submit within 21 days of the date of this order, the appropriate filing fee. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAVON PIERCE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-2690 GEB KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO BUSINESS JOURNAL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1). 21 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Review 22 of court records reveals that on at least three occasions lawsuits filed by the plaintiff have been 23 dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous or malicious or failed to state a claim upon 24 which relief may be granted, as set forth below: 25 Pierce v. California State, CV 12-9211 UA (CW) (C.D. Cal.), November 20, 2012, dismissed as frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Id., ECF No. 5. 26 27 28 Pierce v. Gonzales, 1:10-cv-025 JLT (E.D. Cal.), December 3, 2012, dismissed for failure to state a claim. Id., ECF No. 27. 1 1 Pierce v. Warden of Lancaster, CV 13-1939 UA (CW), March 28, 2013, dismissed as frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Id., ECF No. 2. 2 3 Pierce v. Lancaster State Prison, 2:13-cv-8126 (C.D. Cal.), December 3, 2013, dismissed as frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Id., ECF No. 6. 4 Pierce v. Unknown, 1:15-cv-0650 LJO DLB (E.D. Cal.), December 1, 2015, dismissed for failure to state a claim. Id., ECF No. 38. 5 6 Plaintiff is therefore precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action unless 7 plaintiff is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff 8 has not alleged any facts which suggest that he is under imminent danger of serious physical 9 injury. Thus, plaintiff must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. 10 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit, 11 within twenty-one days from the date of this order, the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff’s failure to 12 comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 13 Dated: March 17, 2016 14 15 16 /pier2690.1915g 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?