Prasad v. Narayan et al
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/28/16; this action is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of federal jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
RABINDRA PRASAD dba PRASAD
CHIROPRACTOR,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-2712 KJM AC (PS)
ORDER
v.
PRAKASH NARAYAN, PAYAL
NARAYAN, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to the United
States Magistrate Judge by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21).
On January 5, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 4. Defendants have filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 5.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
27
the file, the court adopts the magistrate court’s findings and recommendation that this case be
28
remanded. The court however, writes separately to DENY as MOOT defendants’ applications to
1
1
proceed in forma pauperis, having already affirmed this case should be remanded to state court.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2016 (ECF No. 4), are adopted in
4
5
to the extent consistent with this order; and
2. This action is remanded in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to the California Superior
6
Court, Sacramento County, for lack of federal jurisdiction.
7
DATED: September 28, 2016
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?