Prasad v. Narayan et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/28/16; this action is REMANDED to Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of federal jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 RABINDRA PRASAD dba PRASAD CHIROPRACTOR, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:15-cv-2712 KJM AC (PS) ORDER v. PRAKASH NARAYAN, PAYAL NARAYAN, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). On January 5, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 4. Defendants have filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 5. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed 27 the file, the court adopts the magistrate court’s findings and recommendation that this case be 28 remanded. The court however, writes separately to DENY as MOOT defendants’ applications to 1 1 proceed in forma pauperis, having already affirmed this case should be remanded to state court. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2016 (ECF No. 4), are adopted in 4 5 to the extent consistent with this order; and 2. This action is remanded in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to the California Superior 6 Court, Sacramento County, for lack of federal jurisdiction. 7 DATED: September 28, 2016 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?