James v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/7/2016 ORDERING that plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 7/18/2016. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Vijay J. Patel
Attorney at Law: 285585
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel: (562)437-7006
Fax: (562)432-2935
E-Mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DANIEL EDWARD JAMES
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DANIEL EDWARD JAMES
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security.
15
16
17
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:15-cv-02717-AC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-1-
1
Plaintiff Daniel Edward James and Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting
2
Commissioner of Social Security, through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate,
3
subject to this court’s approval, to extend the time by 45 days from June 3, 2016 to
4
July 18, 2016 for Plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment, with all other
5
dates in the Court’s Order Concerning Review Of Social Security Cases extended
6
accordingly. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension. This request is made at
7
the request of Plaintiff’s counsel to allow additional time to fully research the
8
issues presented.
9
DATE: June 2, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
10
/s/ Vijay J. Patel
11
BY: _______________________
Vijay J. Patel
Attorney for plaintiff Mr. Daniel Edward James
12
13
14
15
DATE: June 2, 2016
16
PHILLIP A.TALBERT
Acting United States Attorney
17
18
/s/ Jennifer A. Kenney
19
BY: ____________________________
Jennifer A. Kenney
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for defendant Carolyn W. Colvin
|*authorized by e-mail|
20
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
DATED: June 7, 2016
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?