United States of America v. Samuel
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/2017 DENYING 41 Motion to withdraw the court's 2/17/2016 order. This case remains STAYED pending resolution of defendant's bankruptcy case and further order of the court. (Zignago, K.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
On January 17, 2017, defendant filed a motion to withdraw the court’s February 17, 2016
consolidated order issued in the above-captioned cases. The United States has opposed the
motion. For the reasons discussed below, the defendant’s motion is DENIED.
On February 17, 2016, the court issued a consolidated order in the above-captioned cases
overruling claims of exemption and objections to the writs of garnishment, upholding two of the
three writs, permitting partial garnishment of the funds subject to the third writ, and granting the
United States additional time to further brief certain issues with respect to the third writ.
Defendant then appealed the court’s February 17, 2016 order directly to the Ninth Circuit Court
On June 1, 2016, and before the United States submitted its supplemental briefing, the
court, at the United States’ request, stayed the garnishment proceedings pending resolution of a
bankruptcy case that had been commenced by defendant and her spouse. The United States was
ordered to notify the court within 21 days of resolution of the bankruptcy case and inform the
court what issues remain to be adjudicated in the garnishment proceedings.
Thereafter, on November 3, 2016, the Ninth Circuit dismissed defendant’s appeal upon
defendant’s own motion on the ground that this court’s February 17, 2016 order, issued by a
magistrate judge, was not a final appealable order. Defendant then filed the instant motion to
withdraw that order.
This court finds no proper basis to withdraw the February 17, 2016 order. Although the
order is not a final, appealable order, and no judgment has been entered, the court finds no reason
to reconsider its findings and conclusions in that order. Once the bankruptcy stay is lifted, the
United States, consistent with the court’s prior order, will inform the court what issues remain to
be adjudicated, and request the issuance of findings and recommendations to the district judge for
a final order of garnishment and the entry of judgment.1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s motion to withdraw the court’s February 17, 2016 order, filed in each of
the above-captioned cases, is DENIED.
2. The above-captioned cases remain STAYED pending resolution of defendant’s
bankruptcy case and further order of the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2017
To the extent that the United States requests additional findings and determinations, defendant
will be provided with an opportunity to respond to such a request.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?