United States v. Bradford
Filing
18
ORDER granting 3 APPLICATION for WRIT of GARNISHMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/15. (Kaminski, H)
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2 KURT A. DIDIER
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff
6 United States
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES,
No. 2:15-mc-0022-TLN-DAD
Plaintiff,
12
STIPULATION RE GARNISHMENT;
AND ORDER THEREON
v.
13
14
GARRY BRADFORD,
15
Defendant and Judgment Debtor,
______________________________________
16
17
Criminal Case No. 2:11-CR-00171-TLN
SAN FRANCISCO EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
18
Garnishee.
19
20
Plaintiff United States and defendant and judgment debtor Garry Bradford, through their
21
authorized representatives (collectively the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to a final resolution of the United
22
States’ pending garnishment action against Defendant as follows:
23
24
25
26
27
1.
On March 16, 2015, and March 20, 2015, respectively, the United States sought, and the
Clerk issued, a writ of garnishment against Defendant’s monthly retirement benefits. Dkt Nos. 3 and 5,
respectively. Defendant is a retired firefighter receiving monthly annuity payments from the garnishee,
San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System (SFERS).
2.
By its writ, the United States sought to enforce the restitution order issued by the Court in
28
1
30
Stipulation re Garnishment and Order
1 Defendant’s sentencing in Case No. 2:11-CR-00171-TLN and incorporated in the Amended Judgment in
2 a Criminal Case filed on January 7, 2015. Crim. Dkt. No. 64. Per the amended judgment, Defendant
3 was ordered to pay $1,102,916.18 in restitution plus a $400 assessment. Id. Defendant’s restitution
4 order remains unpaid.
3.
5
SFERS served its Acknowledgment and Answer (the “Answer”) to the United States’
6 writ on May 1, 2015. Dkt. No. 9. The Answer states that Defendant receives a monthly retirement
7 allowance in the gross amount of $12,381.74. After tax and other withholdings, Defendant receives a
8 monthly net allowance of $8,449.81. Id. This net allowance represents Defendant’s non-exempt,
9 disposable retirement earnings arising from his service as a firefighter.
4.
10
SFERS has been withholding 25% of Defendant’s non-exempt, disposable earnings since
11 April 2015. The 25% withholding amount comports with the Consumer Credit Protection Act’s 25%
12 garnishment cap on a debtor’s non-exempt disposable earnings. 15 U.S.C. § 1673(a)(1).
5.
13
On April 9, 2015, Defendant, then proceeding pro se, filed a claim of exemption to the
14 garnishment action and requested a hearing thereon. Dkt. No. 8. The Court set a briefing schedule but
15 not a hearing date as Defendant was then incarcerated in Texas. Dkt. No. 10. In an order filed on
16 September 28, 2015, the Court set another briefing schedule and a hearing date of November 13, 2015,
17 following Defendant’s retention of counsel and counsel’s request for hearing. Dkt. No. 14.
6.
18
The Parties notified the Court on October 13, 2015 that they had agreed to a settlement of
19 this garnishment action. Dkt. No. 15. To effectuate this agreement, Defendant agrees to withdraw: his
20 claim of exemption; request for hearing; and any objection he has to this proceeding. And, the Parties
21 agree that the Court can and should enter an order as follows:
A.
22
Garnishing 25% of Defendant’s non-exempt, disposable (net) monthly SFERS
23 retirement payments from the date SFERS began withholding these payments plus any amounts payable
24 to him until December 31, 2015;
B.
25
Garnishing 22.5% of Defendant’s non-exempt, disposable (net) monthly SFERS
26 retirement payments payable after January 1, 2016 and continuing thereafter until further order of Court;
27 and
28
C.
Directing SFERS to pay the garnishment amounts to the Clerk of the Court as
2
30
Stipulation re Garnishment and Order
1 stated more specifically in the accompanying order.
2
7.
This is a continuing writ of garnishment against Defendant’s SFERS benefits which shall
3 remain in place until further Court order. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve matters through
4 ancillary proceedings in the case, if necessary.
Respectfully submitted,
5
6 FOR THE UNITED STATES:
7
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
8
9 Dated: October 28, 2015
By:
/s/ Kurt A. Didier
KURT A. DIDIER
Assistant United States Attorney
By:
/s/ Garry Bradford
GARRY BRADFORD, Individually
10
11
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
12
13 Dated: October 28, 2015
14
15
16 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
17
18
Dated: October 28, 2015
19
By:
/s/ Betty J. Williams
BETTY J. WILLIAMS
Attorney at Law
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
30
Stipulation re Garnishment and Order
1
ORDER
2
The Court, having reviewed the court files and the Parties’ Stipulation re Garnishment (the
3 “Stipulation”), and good cause appearing therefrom, herby APPROVES the Stipulation. Accordingly,
4 IT IS ORDERED that:
5
1.
The United States’ application for a final order of garnishment is GRANTED.
6
2.
San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System (SFERS) shall GARNISH defendant
7 Garry Bradford’s monthly non-exempt, disposable retirement payments at the rate of 25% from each
8 payment from the date it received the United States’ writ of garnishment through December 31, 2015.
9
3.
Beginning on January 1, 2016, SFERS shall GARNISH defendant Garry Bradford’s
10 monthly non-exempt, disposable retirement payments at the rate of 22.5% from each payment until: the
11 restitution amount is paid in full; further order of this Court; or SFERS no longer has custody,
12 possession or control of any property belonging to Defendant.
13
4.
SFERS shall DELIVER, within twenty (20) days of the filing of this Order, a cashier’s
14 check, money order or company draft in the sum of all amounts previously withheld by SFERS pursuant
15 to the writ of garnishment, made payable to the Clerk of Court. SFERS shall also provide the United
16 States a written accounting, by pay period, of the amounts withheld from Defendant’s retirement
17 payments during the period from service of the writ of garnishment to entry of this final order.
18
5.
Following its payment of the withheld amount as stated in paragraph 4, above, SFERS
19 shall thereafter DELIVER, on a monthly basis, payments to the Clerk of Court consistent with this
20 order. SFERS shall NOTIFY the United States, within 30 days, of any change: in the amount of
21 Defendant’s monthly retirement benefit; in Defendant’s entitlement to the retirement payment; or
22 affecting SFERS status as garnishee under this order.
23
6.
This is a CONTINUING writ of garnishment against Defendant’s SFERS benefits which
24 shall remain in place until further Court order. The Court shall RETAIN jurisdiction to resolve matters
25 through ancillary proceedings in the case, if necessary.
26
7.
All payments shall be made payable to the “Clerk of the Court” at the Office of the Clerk,
27 United States District Court, Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento,
28
4
30
Stipulation re Garnishment and Order
1 California 95814. SFERS shall also state the docket number (Case No.: 2:11-CR-00171-TLN) on the
2 payment instrument and, if it desires a payment receipt, shall include a self-addressed, stamped envelope
3 with the payment.
4 Dated: October 29, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Ddad1\orders.civil
bradford0022.stip.granish.ord.docx
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
30
Stipulation re Garnishment and Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?