City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System et al v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 01/21/16 ORDERING that the 19 Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED; the deadline to file a Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate Judge's Order is EXTENDED to 02/12/16. (Benson, A)
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)
AELISH M. BAIG (201279)
3
ARMAN ZOHRABIAN (230492)
4 SUNNY S. SARKIS (258073)
DAVID W. HALL (274921)
5 Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
6 San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415/288-4545
7
415/288-4534 (fax)
8 shawnw@grdlaw.com
aelishb@rgrdlaw.com
9 azohrabian@rgrdlaw.com
ssarkis@rgrdlaw.com
10 dhall@rgrdlaw.com
11
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL ) Case No. 2:15-mc-0146 WBS AC
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
)
Individually and on Behalf of All Others
) Main Case: 2:12-cv-5275 MCA LDW
Similarly Situated,
) (D.N.J.)
)
Plaintiffs,
) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
) REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
vs.
) FILE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
) BY THE DISTRICT COURT OF
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC., et al.,
) MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING
)
Defendants.
)
)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Eastern District of California Civil Local
2 Rule 144, the deadline to file a Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate
3 Judge’s Order of January 7, 2016 is hereby extended to February 12, 2016.
4
5
*
6
7
*
*
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: January 21, 2016
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLTFS’ REQ FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REQ
FOR RECONSIDERATION BY THE DISTRICT CRT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?