City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System et al v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 01/21/16 ORDERING that the 19 Request for Extension of Time is GRANTED; the deadline to file a Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate Judge's Order is EXTENDED to 02/12/16. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) AELISH M. BAIG (201279) 3 ARMAN ZOHRABIAN (230492) 4 SUNNY S. SARKIS (258073) DAVID W. HALL (274921) 5 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 6 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 7 415/288-4534 (fax) 8 shawnw@grdlaw.com aelishb@rgrdlaw.com 9 azohrabian@rgrdlaw.com ssarkis@rgrdlaw.com 10 dhall@rgrdlaw.com 11 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL ) Case No. 2:15-mc-0146 WBS AC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Others ) Main Case: 2:12-cv-5275 MCA LDW Similarly Situated, ) (D.N.J.) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ) REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO vs. ) FILE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION ) BY THE DISTRICT COURT OF PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC., et al., ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING ) Defendants. ) ) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Eastern District of California Civil Local 2 Rule 144, the deadline to file a Request for Reconsideration by the District Court of Magistrate 3 Judge’s Order of January 7, 2016 is hereby extended to February 12, 2016. 4 5 * 6 7 * * ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: January 21, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLTFS’ REQ FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REQ FOR RECONSIDERATION BY THE DISTRICT CRT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?