Rehana v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/11/16 ORDERING that the date for plaintiff to file the Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 08/05/16. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
Jared T. Walker (SB#269029)
2020 Capitol Avenue
Suite 7
Sacramento, CA 95811
T: (916) 476-5044
F: (916) 476-5064
jared@saclawoffices.com
Attorney for Plaintiff,
ANITA M. REHANA
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
ANITA M. REHANA,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00006-EFB
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY
EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPENING BRIEF
12
13
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
15
16
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record,
17
that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30)
18
days until August 5, 2016. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time. Despite due
19
diligence, Plaintiff’s counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff’s opening brief in accordance with
20
the current scheduling order due to counsel’s current workload which has involved conflicting
21
deadlines in unrelated matters
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
1
Dated: July 5, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
2
/s/ Jared T. Walker
Jared T. Walker,
Attorney for Plaintiff
3
4
SO STIPULATED:
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
5
6
7
Dated:
8
9
By:
/s/ Geralyn Gulseth, Esq. for Cynthia DeNardi*
(authorized by e-mail on 7/5/2016)
Cynthia B. De Nardi
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
10
ORDER
11
12
13
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
14
Dated: July 11, 2016.
15
_
HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN
U.S. Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?