Rehana v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 07/11/16 ORDERING that the date for plaintiff to file the Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 08/05/16. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Jared T. Walker (SB#269029) 2020 Capitol Avenue Suite 7 Sacramento, CA 95811 T: (916) 476-5044 F: (916) 476-5064 jared@saclawoffices.com Attorney for Plaintiff, ANITA M. REHANA 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANITA M. REHANA, Case No.: 2:16-cv-00006-EFB 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF 12 13 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 17 that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) 18 days until August 5, 2016. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time. Despite due 19 diligence, Plaintiff’s counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff’s opening brief in accordance with 20 the current scheduling order due to counsel’s current workload which has involved conflicting 21 deadlines in unrelated matters 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF 1 Dated: July 5, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 2 /s/ Jared T. Walker Jared T. Walker, Attorney for Plaintiff 3 4 SO STIPULATED: PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 5 6 7 Dated: 8 9 By: /s/ Geralyn Gulseth, Esq. for Cynthia DeNardi* (authorized by e-mail on 7/5/2016) Cynthia B. De Nardi Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 10 ORDER 11 12 13 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: July 11, 2016. 15 _ HON. EDMUND F. BRENNAN U.S. Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?