Beals v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/29/2017 ORDERING that EAJA fees are awarded to plaintiff in the amount of Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500.00). (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
Jared T. Walker (SB#269029)
1104 Corporate Way
Sacramento, CA 95831
T: (916) 476-5044
F: (916) 476-5064
jared@saclawoffices.com
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff,
TIMOTHY L. BEALS
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
TIMOTHY L. BEALS,
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00008-CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Commissioner of Social Security,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD
OF
ATTORNEY
FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
17
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Timothy L. Beals (Plaintiff) be awarded attorney
18
fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of Six
19
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal
20
services incurred on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action. Plaintiff
21
agrees to waive recovery of costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
22
Upon the Court’s issuance of an order granting EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
23
determine the issue of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue
24
v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 597-598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on if the
25
fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset
26
Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are
27
subject to any offset.
28
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ODER FOR
AWARD UNDER EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
1
Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government will cause the payment of fees to be made
2
directly to Plaintiff’s attorney, LAW OFFICE OF JARED T. WALKER, P.C., pursuant to the
3
assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made will be delivered to JARED T. WALKER.
4
This stipulation constitutes a settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and
5
does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of defendant under the EAJA or otherwise.
6
Payment of the agreed amount will constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims
7
that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s attorney including LAW OFFICE OF JARED T. WALKER, P.C.,
8
may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
9
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security
10
attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
11
Dated: November 27, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
12
__/s/ Jared Walker
JARED T. WALKER,
Attorney for Plaintiff
13
14
SO STIPULATED:
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
15
16
17
Dated: November 27, 2017
18
19
22
23
/s/ Ellinor R. Coder
(*authorized by e-mail on Nov. 27, 2017)
Ellinor R. Coder
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
20
21
By:
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access
to Justice Act (EAJA),
IT IS ORDERED that EAJA fees are awarded to plaintiff in the amount of Six Thousand
24
Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500.00) subject to the terms of the parties’ foregoing Stipulation.
25
Dated: November 29, 2017
26
27
28
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?