Anderson v. California Medical Facility - Solano

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/5/2017 DENYING plaintiff's motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 42 at 4-7). (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JULIUS ANDERSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0018 TLN CKD P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, SOLANO, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff seeks leave to amend his third amended complaint in order to attempt to state a 17 claim upon which he may proceed against defendant Harris. The court has reviewed plaintiff’s 18 proposed fourth amended complaint (ECF No. 42 at 4-7) and there are no allegations concerning 19 defendant Harris. Plaintiff also seeks leave to amend in order to attempt to plead compliance with 20 the California Tort Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 945.4 (CTCA) with respect to claims arising 21 under state law. However, plaintiff fails to identify any claims arising under state law in his 22 proposed fourth amended complaint, nor does he adequately allege that he complied with the 23 CTCA as to those claims. Finally, the proposed fourth amended complaint is not signed as 24 required under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 For all the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 9, 2017 2 motion for leave to amend is denied. 3 Dated: December 5, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1/kly ande0018.mta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?