General Electric Capital Corporation v. Rhino Business Systems, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/4/2016 ORDERING GE Capital to provide supplemental case law to support its 7 Motion for Right to Attach Order, and specifically the argument that its description of the property to be attached is "reasonably adequate," within 7 days of this order. The supplemental filing shall identify cases only, by name and citation, without additional briefing or argument. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:16-cv-00029-KJM-CMK ORDER v. RHINO BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant. 17 18 19 On March 25, 2016, the court held a hearing on plaintiff General Electric Capital 20 Corporation’s (GE Capital) Motion for Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment (Motion). 21 At the hearing counsel for GE Capital argued that case law supports his argument that pointing to 22 a specific stream of cash flow –– “all proceeds from the sale of Rhino Business Systems, Inc.’s 23 assets to Ray Morgan RMC, Inc.” –– is “reasonably adequate to permit the defendant to identify 24 the property sought to be attached” under California Code of Civil Procedure section 484.020(e). 25 Counsel did not provide citations to the cases on which he relies. 26 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that GE Capital provide supplemental case law to support its motion, and specifically the argument that its description of the property to 28 1 1 be attached is “reasonably adequate,” within seven (7) days of this order. The supplemental filing 2 shall identify cases only, by name and citation, without additional briefing or argument. 3 DATED: April 4, 2016. 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?