Bratset v. Davis Joint Unified School District et al
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/27/2018 SETTING a Status Conference for 3/30/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report by 3/16/2018. Defendant shall file and serve a status report by 3/23/2018. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAURA BRATSET, et al.,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:16-cv-0035 KJM DB PS
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
DAVIS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff, Laura Bratset, is proceeding pro se in this action. Therefore, the matter was
19
referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
20
On February 16, 2018, defendant filed an answer. (ECF No. 77.)
21
22
23
Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, March 30, 2018, at 10:00
24
a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No.
25
27, before the undersigned.
26
2. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if
27
proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status
28
conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the
1
1
courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours
2
before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a party may not appear telephonically over a
3
cellphone.
4
3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before March 16, 2018, and
5
defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before March 23, 2018. Each party’s status
6
report shall address all of the following matters:
7
a.
Progress of service of process;
b.
Possible joinder of additional parties;
c.
Possible amendment of the pleadings;
d.
Jurisdiction and venue;
12
e.
Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
13
f.
Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of
expert witnesses;
g.
Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for
discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial
conference and trial;
h.
Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to
the relative simplicity or complexity of the action1;
i.
Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in
bankruptcy;
j.
Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this
matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of
her so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference
before another magistrate judge;
k.
Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States
Magistrate Judge; and
l.
Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of
this action.
8
9
10
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The parties shall also address whether it is more appropriate to schedule this case consistent
with administrative review, i.e., setting a deadline for the lodging of a record, the filing of a
motion for summary judgment, the filing of opposition, etc., in lieu of a standard schedule.
2
1
4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the
2
status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110
3
and 183.
4
Dated: February 27, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/bratset0035.ossc.ord
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?