Besoyan v. Yee et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/28/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 60 days; CAUTIONING the plaintiff that a failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL J. BESOYAN, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-46-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 26, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and granted him thirty days 18 to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. On March 10, 2017, plaintiff filed documents in 19 which he requests a 90-day extension of time to file an amended complaint.1 ECF Nos. 5, 6. 20 It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is granted in part. 21 Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 60 days of the date of this order. Failure to 22 timely file an amended complaint may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 23 DATED: March 28, 2017. 24 25 26 27 28 1 Within these documents plaintiff also expresses his general disagreement with the dismissal of his original complaint. ECF Nos. 4, 6.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?