Williams, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.

Filing 36

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/2/2018 ORDERING For good cause shown, the plaintiff states may later elect to intervene, to the extent provided by their false claims acts; Because the State of Maryland has declined to interven e in this matter, all claims asserted on behalf of Maryland are DISMISSED without prejudice. All pleadings and motions filed in this action, as well as all orders, shall be served upon the State of California, which shall disseminate those papers to other plaintiff states when appropriate; Should the relator or the defendant propose that this action be dismissed, settled, or otherwise discontinued, the plaintiff states shall be notified and shall have the right to comment and be heard; The plaintiff states notice of election to decline intervention and accompanying proposed order, ECF No. 35 , are UNSEALED; and All other currently sealed documents will remain under TEMPORARY SEAL pending further order of this court.(Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 18 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE STATES OF CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MONTANA, NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OKLAHOMA, RHODE ISLAND, THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, TEXAS, VERMONT, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, and WASHINGTON, ex rel. TUESDAY WILLIAMS, 19 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 No. 2:16-cv-0057 KJM AC ORDER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC., Defendant. 24 25 The states of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, 26 Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, 27 New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, 28 Texas, Vermont, Washington, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealths of 1 1 Massachusetts and Virginia (collectively, “plaintiff states”) have declined to intervene in this qui 2 tam action. The court orders as follows: 3 4 (1) For good cause shown, the plaintiff states may later elect to intervene, to the extent provided by their false claims acts; 5 (2) Because the State of Maryland has declined to intervene in this matter, all 6 claims asserted on behalf of Maryland are dismissed without prejudice. See Md. Code Ann., 7 Health Gen, § 2-604(a)(7); 8 9 10 11 (3) All pleadings and motions filed in this action, as well as all orders, shall be served upon the State of California, which shall disseminate those papers to other plaintiff states when appropriate; (4) Should the relator or the defendant propose that this action be dismissed, 12 settled, or otherwise discontinued, the plaintiff states shall be notified and shall have the right to 13 comment and be heard; 14 15 16 17 18 19 (5) The plaintiff states’ notice of election to decline intervention and accompanying proposed order, ECF No. 35, are UNSEALED; and (6) All other currently sealed documents will remain under TEMPORARY SEAL pending further order of this court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 2, 2018. 20 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?