Williams v. Lopez et al

Filing 12

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/30/16 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MS. LONNIE WILLIAMS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

No. 2:16-cv-0131 KJM KJN P

T. LOPEZ, et al.,

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
By an order filed June 7, 2016, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was

17
18

denied, and she was ordered to pay the filing fee within fourteen days. The fourteen day period

19

has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not paid the

20

appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

21

dismissed without prejudice.

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

25

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

26

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

27

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

28

////
1

1

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

2

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: June 30, 2016

4
5
/will0131.fpf

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2