T., et al v. Sacramento City School District
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/12/16: Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys' Fees shall be filed on or before August 31, 2016. Opposition Memorandum shall be fil ed on or before September 30, 2016. Reply Memorandum shall be filed by no later than 14 days after the District's Opposition Memorandum is filed. HEARING set for 11/17/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. on the merits of the Motion. (Kaminski, H)
5
F. Richard Ruderman (SB No. 142226)
rick@rudermanknox.com
Colleen A. Snyder (SB No. 274064)
colleen@rudermanknox.com
Ruderman & Knox, LLP
1300 National Drive, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95834
Telephone: (916) 563-0100
Facsimile: (916) 563-0114
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
1
2
3
4
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JAY T. and ANNE M.-T., individually, and as
guardian ad litem for M.M.-T.,
CASE NO: 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-AC
vs.
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING AND
HEARING SCHEDULE;
ORDER THEREON
SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
Courtroom: 7, 14th Floor
Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
Plaintiffs,
Defendant.
18
19
20
Action Filed: January 21, 2016
Pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, Plaintiffs Jay T., Anne M.-T., individually, and as
21
guardians ad litem for M.M.-T. (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and
22
Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District (“District”), by and through its undersigned
23
counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to the following:
24
1)
On May 16, 2016, the parties agreed, via stipulation, to the following briefing and
25
hearing schedule:
26
•
Plaintiffs’ Opening Memorandum to be filed on or before July 22, 2016;
27
•
District’s Opposition Memorandum to be filed on or before August 19, 2016;
28
•
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief to be filed within fourteen days of filing of Opposition
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
OF BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE;
ORDER THEREON
JAY T., et al. v. SCUUSD
Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-AC
Page 1
Brief;
1
2
3
•
2)
On May 17, 2016, the Court ordered the briefing and hearing schedule as proposed by the
parties.
4
5
Hearing on September 22, 2016.
3)
Because of unforeseen work obligations, and a delay in receiving the administrative
6
record, counsel for Plaintiffs requested, and counsel for Defendant agreed, to continue the
7
briefing and hearing schedule as follows:
8
•
Plaintiffs’ Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys’ Fees
(limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers, shall be filed on or before August 31,
9
2016;
10
11
•
District’s Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers
shall be filed on or before September 30, 2016;
12
13
•
Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall
14
be filed by no later than 14 days after the District’s Opposition Memorandum is
15
filed;
16
17
•
4)
There have been no previous modifications to the proposed briefing and hearing
schedule, either by stipulation or Court order.
18
19
Hearing on November 17, 2016.
5)
Accordingly, the parties request approval for this modification of the schedule.
20
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
23
Dated: July 11, 2016
RUDERMAN & KNOX, LLP
24
/s/ Colleen A. Snyder
COLLEEN A. SNYDER
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jay T. and Anne M.-T.,
individually and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
OF BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE;
ORDER THEREON
JAY T., et al. v. SCUUSD
Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-AC
Page 2
1
Dated: July 11, 2016
LOZANO SMITH
2
/s/ Sloan Simmons
SLOAN SIMMONS
Attorney for Defendant Sacramento City Unified
School District
3
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between Plaintiffs Jay T. and Anne M.-T.,
9
individually, and as guardians ad litem for M.M.-T. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Sacramento
10
City Unified School District (“District”), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE:
11
The Court hereby orders the briefing and hearing schedule be continued in this action as follows:
12
13
14
15
16
1. Plaintiffs’ Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys’ Fees (limited to
25 pages) and supporting papers, shall be filed on or before August 31, 2016;
2. District’s Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be
filed on or before September 30, 2016;
3. Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed
17
by no later than 14 days after the District’s Opposition Memorandum is filed; and
18
4. A hearing is set for November 17, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. on the merits of the Motion.
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 12, 2016
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
OF BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE;
ORDER THEREON
JAY T., et al. v. SCUUSD
Case No. 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-AC
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?