Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc. et al

Filing 152

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/25/2022 ORDERING that the production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). (Coll, A)

1

4

Mark D. Nielsen, Esq., CA Bar No. 210,023
[e-mail]
SCHEEF & STONE, LLP
2600 Network Boulevard, Suite 400
Frisco, Texas 75034
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

5

- and -

6

Daniel M. Cislo, Esq., CA Bar No. 125,378
[e-mail]
C. Wook Pak, Esq., CA Bar No. 244,780
[e-mail]
CISLO & THOMAS LLP
12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1700
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC

2
3

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ROBERT M. HARKINS, JR. (SBN 179525)
[e-mail]
RUYAKCHERIAN, LLP
1936 University Ave, Suite 350
Berkeley, CA 94704
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys For Defendants,
X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC. AND JEWELL ATTACHMENTS, LLC

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC,

) Case No. 2:16-cv-00148-KJM-JDP
)
Plaintiff,
) [Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller]
)
vs.
) FED.R.EVID. 502 ORDER
)
X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC., JEWELL
)
ATTACHMENTS, LLC, J.D.M.L., INC. dba )
STANDARD INDUSTRIES, and ALLSTATE )
PAPER & METAL RECYCLING CO., INC. )
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

ORDER

1
2

Plaintiff, Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “ASR”) and Defendants X-Body

3

Equipment, Inc. and Jewell Attachments, LLC (“Defendants”), by and through their respective

4

counsel of record, have submitted a stipulation to the Court requesting the entry of an order pursuant

5

to Fed. R. Evid. 502.

6
7

Upon considering the parties’ stipulation, and finding good cause for the requested relief, it
is hereby ordered that:

8

The production of privileged or work-product protected documents,

9

electronically stored information (“ESI”) or information, whether

10

inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection

11

from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding.

12

This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection

13

allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).

14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 25, 2022.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Fed.R.Evid. 502

1

Case No. 2:16-cv-00148-KJM-EFB