Arzaga v. Cate et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/2/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court is directed to remove the active case designation from plaintiff's subsequently filed motion for preliminary injunction, see ECF No. 33 , and to refrain from responding to any further documents filed in this case.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL J. ARZAGA,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-0151 AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
By order and judgment filed October 26, 2016, this action was dismissed without leave to
18
amend. See ECF Nos. 29, 30. Due to this dismissal, the court will no longer respond to any
19
documents filed in this case. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to remove the active case
20
designation from plaintiff’s subsequently filed motion for preliminary injunction, see ECF No.
21
33, and to refrain from responding to any further documents filed in this case.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 2, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?