Lucas v. Masedeo, et al.

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/09/17 ordering that withi 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he wishes to dismiss or proceed with this action. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSE LUCAS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2: 16-cv-0171 KJN P v. ORDER C. MASEDO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 26, 2017, plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Motion to dismiss and request 19 for injunction.” (ECF No. 34.) In this pleading, plaintiff requests that this action be dismissed. 20 Plaintiff also requests that the court order the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department to take 21 plaintiff’s report against defendant Masadeo for assault and imprisonment. Plaintiff requests that 22 defendant Masadeo be arrested for his actions. The court cannot order the relief sought by plaintiff against defendant Masadeo in the 23 24 pending pleading. In a civil rights action, the court cannot order a criminal prosecution as a 25 remedy. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to inform the court whether he still wishes to dismiss 26 this action if the court cannot order the relief requested in his July 26, 2017 pleading. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this 2 order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he wishes to dismiss or proceed with this action. 3 Dated: August 9, 2017 4 5 6 Luc171.ord 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?