Lucas v. Masedeo, et al.
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/09/17 ordering that withi 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he wishes to dismiss or proceed with this action. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESSE LUCAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 16-cv-0171 KJN P
v.
ORDER
C. MASEDO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On July 26, 2017, plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Motion to dismiss and request
19
for injunction.” (ECF No. 34.) In this pleading, plaintiff requests that this action be dismissed.
20
Plaintiff also requests that the court order the Yolo County Sheriff’s Department to take
21
plaintiff’s report against defendant Masadeo for assault and imprisonment. Plaintiff requests that
22
defendant Masadeo be arrested for his actions.
The court cannot order the relief sought by plaintiff against defendant Masadeo in the
23
24
pending pleading. In a civil rights action, the court cannot order a criminal prosecution as a
25
remedy. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to inform the court whether he still wishes to dismiss
26
this action if the court cannot order the relief requested in his July 26, 2017 pleading.
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this
2
order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he wishes to dismiss or proceed with this action.
3
Dated: August 9, 2017
4
5
6
Luc171.ord
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?