Hardney v. Warren et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/11/2017 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 12 and 14 Motions for Preliminary Injunctions. (York, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN HARDNEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0172-GEB-EFB P

v.

ORDER

R. WARREN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 13, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 13, 2017, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s motions for the return of his legal property (ECF Nos. 12 & 14), construed

4

as motions for preliminary injunctions, are denied.

5

Dated: December 11, 2017

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2