Sims v. Lizarraga et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/17/2017 ORDERING plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint as outlined in the 7/24/2017 screening order. If plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, the case will proceed on the original complaint as screened. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a prisoner complaint form. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARIUS SIMS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-0204 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE A. LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By 18 order filed July 24, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and he was given the option to 19 proceed immediately on his deliberate indifference claims against defendants Clark-Barlow and 20 Guzman and his retaliation claims against defendants Sisneroz, Guzman, Saechao, and Collins or 21 to amend the complaint. ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has now notified the court that he would like to 22 amend the complaint. ECF No. 21 at 2. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the service of this order to file an amended 25 complaint as outlined in the July 24, 2017 screening order. If plaintiff fails to file an amended 26 complaint, the case will proceed on the original complaint as screened and the claims against 27 defendants Ramm, Ball, Lee, Lizarraga, Davis, Cantu, Murphy, O’Conner, Moeckly, Green, 28 Beasley, and Sepulveda and any claims against defendants Clark-Barlow, Sisneroz, Guzman, 1 1 Saechao, and Collins not identified in Section IV of the screening order will remain dismissed 2 without prejudice. 3 4 5 6 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 17, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?