Brisette v. California Supreme Court et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/10/16 ORDERING that this document 40 will be placed in the file and DISREGARDED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 2:16-cv-0208 GEB GGH P
This petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied on September 7, 2016 and judgment
entered accordingly. Petitioner’s filing, entitled “reply to respondent’s objections1 to magistrate
judge’s findings and recommendations,” filed on September 8, 2016, does not appear to be one
contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules Governing § 2254
Cases. Therefore, this document will be placed in the file and disregarded.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 10, 2016
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In fact, respondent filed a reply to petitioner’s objections, which was considered by the district
judge and which was followed by the instant filing. See ECF Nos. 36, 37, 40.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?