Brisette v. California Supreme Court et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/10/16 ORDERING that this document 40 will be placed in the file and DISREGARDED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 PHILLIP BRISETTE, 10 No. 2:16-cv-0208 GEB GGH P Petitioner, 11 v. 12 ERIC ARNOLD, 13 ORDER Respondent. 14 This petition for writ of habeas corpus was denied on September 7, 2016 and judgment 15 16 entered accordingly. Petitioner’s filing, entitled “reply to respondent’s objections1 to magistrate 17 judge’s findings and recommendations,” filed on September 8, 2016, does not appear to be one 18 contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules Governing § 2254 19 Cases. Therefore, this document will be placed in the file and disregarded. IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: October 10, 2016 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 GGH:076; bris0208.158 26 27 28 1 In fact, respondent filed a reply to petitioner’s objections, which was considered by the district judge and which was followed by the instant filing. See ECF Nos. 36, 37, 40.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?