Guzman et al v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/1/1, ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; each side to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Lisa Ladner JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) EMILY ERDMAN (Cal. State Bar No. 301462) PAUL HASTINGS LLP PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paullhastings.com emilyerdman@paullhastings.com 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 AARON GUZMAN and LISA LADNER, 19 Plaintiffs, No. 2:16-CV-00211-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 20 vs. Judge: Honorable John A. Mendez 21 22 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Complaint Filed: Trial Date: May 7, 2015 None Set 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-00211-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081496.1 1 Plaintiff Lisa Ladner and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective counsel 2 of record, hereby stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 3 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 5 Dated: November 30, 2017. 6 MATTHEW RIGHETTI JOHN GLUGOSKI MICHAEL RIGHETTI RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 7 By: /s/ Michael Righetti Michael Righetti Attorneys for Plaintiff Lisa Ladner 8 9 10 11 Dated: November 30, 2017. 12 JEFFREY D. WOHL JUSTIN M. SCOTT EMILY ERDMAN PAUL HASTINGS LLP 13 By: /s/ Justin M. Scott 14 Justin M. Scott Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-00211-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081496.1 1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Lisa Ladner JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JUSTIN M. SCOTT (Cal. State Bar No. 302502) EMILY ERDMAN (Cal. State Bar No. 301462) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com justinscott@paulhastings.com emilyerdman@paullhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 AARON GUZMAN and LISA LADNER, 19 Plaintiffs, No. 2:16-CV-00211-JAM-EFB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 20 vs. Judge: Honorable John A. Mendez 21 22 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Complaint Filed: Trial Date: May 7, 2015 None set 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-00211-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081497.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side 3 to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 Dated: December 1, 2017 5 /s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ John A. Mendez United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-00211-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 92081497.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?