Jones v. Elk Grove Unified School District

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/21/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHELSHEE JONES,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-0215 TLN GGH PS

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

By order filed March 14, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days

19

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the

20

deficiencies in her complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

21

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

22

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

23

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of her current

24

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

25

the party is fully effective.

26

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given

27

in the March 14, 2016 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

28

with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
1

1

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

3

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

4

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

5

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

6

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

7

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

8

Dated: April 21, 2016

9

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

10

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16

GGH:076/Jones0215.fta

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2