Wilson v. Fox et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/9/2019 GRANTING 39 Motion for a Continuance and CONTINUING the 35 Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing to 2/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff shall file a response to 35 Motion for Summary Judgment no later than 2/6/2019. Failure to file a response will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRED WILSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-0219 JAM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ROBERT FOX, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. After plaintiff failed to meet his January 2, 2019 deadline for responding to
19
defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the undersigned continued the January 16, 2019
20
hearing on the motion by three weeks. ECF No. 38. On January 7, 2019, the court received
21
plaintiff’s motion for a thirty-day continuance in order to allow him to obtain a declaration in
22
support of his opposition to the motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 39. The certificate of
23
service states that the motion was mailed on January 2, 2019. Id. at 9.
24
Plaintiff’s request will be granted and the hearing will be continued an additional two
25
weeks. However, plaintiff is cautioned that because he is not incarcerated, he is no longer entitled
26
to the benefit of the prison mailbox rule. This means that his documents are no longer considered
27
filed on the day he mails them. They are considered filed on the day they are received by the
28
court, and must be received by the court by any applicable deadlines in order to be timely.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for a continuance (ECF No. 39) is granted.
3
2. The February 6, 2019 hearing on defendants’ motion for summary is continued to
4
5
February 20, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.
3. Plaintiff shall file a response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment no later
6
than February 6, 2019. Failure to file a response will result in a recommendation that this case be
7
dismissed.
8
DATED: January 9, 2019
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?