Bobadilla v. Lizarraga et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/05/17 DENYING the 22 Motion for Reconsideration; the 21 09/06/17 Order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY BOBADILLA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:16-cv-226-GEB-EFB P

ORDER

J. LIZARRAGA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On September 15, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

18

judge’s order filed September 6, 2017, denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel.

19

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

20

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

21

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

23

magistrate judge filed September 6, 2017, is affirmed and the Clerk of the Court shall terminate

24

docket number 22.

25

Dated: October 5, 2017

26
27
28
1