Bobadilla v. Lizarraga et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/05/17 DENYING the 22 Motion for Reconsideration; the 21 09/06/17 Order of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY BOBADILLA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:16-cv-226-GEB-EFB P ORDER J. LIZARRAGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 15, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate 18 judge’s order filed September 6, 2017, denying plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel. 19 Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly 20 erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not 21 appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 22 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the 23 magistrate judge filed September 6, 2017, is affirmed and the Clerk of the Court shall terminate 24 docket number 22. 25 Dated: October 5, 2017 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?