Phan v. Employment Development Department

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/22/16 ORDERING that this matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:16-cv-256 KJM CKD. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LOAN PHAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-256 KJM CKD PS v. ORDER EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, Defendant. 16 17 This matter was initially referred to the magistrate judge for pretrial management because 18 19 plaintiff was proceeding pro se. See Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 19, 2016, counsel 20 substituted in for plaintiff. Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, pretrial matters, other 21 than discovery motions, should now be noticed before the District Judge assigned to this action. 22 The magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties described in Local Rule 302(c)(1)-(20). 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action; 25 2. All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; and 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be 2 No. 2:16-cv-256 KJM CKD. 3 Dated: September 22, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 4 phan0256.ref 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?