O'Campo v. Carwood Skypark, LLC
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/2/2016 DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice, Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
1
5
Scottlynn J Hubbard, SBN 212970
Khushpreet R. Mehton, SBN 276827
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
12 Williamsburg Lane
Chico, CA 95926
Telephone: (530) 895-3252
Facsimile: (530) 894-8244
Email: usdceast@hubslaw.com
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff Dimas O’Campo
7
Marcus S. Bird, SBN 147463
HOLLISTER & BRACE
1126 Santa Barbara Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Telephone: (805) 963-6711
Facsimile: (805) 965-0329
Email: msbird@hbsb.com
2
3
4
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant Carwood Skypark, LLC
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
Dimas O’Campo,
18
19
20
21
Case No. 2:16-cv-00270-JAM-CMK
Plaintiff,
v.
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal and
Order Thereon
Carwood Skypark, LLC,
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
O’Campo v. Carwood Skypark, LLC
Case No. 2:16-cv-00270-JAM-CMK
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon
Page 1
1
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:
2
Plaintiff Dimas O’Campo and Defendant Carwood Skypark, LLC,
3
stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter a dismissal with prejudice of
4
plaintiff’s complaint in the above-entitled action in its entirety pursuant to Fed.
5
R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).
6
Dated: August 2, 2016
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
7
8
/s/ Scottlynn J Hubbard
Scottlynn J Hubbard
Attorneys for Plaintiff Dimas O’Campo
9
10
11
12
Dated: August 2, 2016
HOLLISTER & BRACE
13
/s/ Marcus S. Bird
Marcus S. Bird
Attorneys for Defendant Carwood Skypark, LLC
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case
20
No. 2:16-cv-00270-JAM-CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its
21
entirety.
22
23
24
Dated: 8/2/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
United States District Court Judge
25
26
27
28
O’Campo v. Carwood Skypark, LLC
Case No. 2:16-cv-00270-JAM-CMK
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?