Saperstein v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/21/2016 ORDERING the parties to confer as required by F.R.Cv.P. 26(f), and prepare and submit to the Court a joint status report that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan, by 5/2/2016. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MICHAEL P. McNAMARA (SBN 106079) KIRSTEN H. SPIRA (SBN 119885) STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, California 90067-5052 Telephone: (310) 734-3200 // Facsimile: (310) 734-3300 Email: mmcnamara@steptoe.com Email: kspira@steptoe.com MORGAN L. HECTOR (SBN 246573) STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 700 Los Angeles CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 439-9494 // Facsimile: (213) 439-9599 Email: mhector@steptoe.com Attorneys for Defendant GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 GARRY SAPERSTEIN, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 2:16-cv-00271-JAM-EFB Hon. John A. Mendez v. JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, and DOES 1 CONTINUE JOINT STATUS REPORT, RULE 26(f) DISCOVERY PLAN, AND through 100, inclusive, RELATED DEADLINES Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Doc. # DC-9011964 v.1 1 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO THE HONORABLE COURT: This Stipulation to continue, by three weeks, the 3 4 deadline to file a joint status report, Rule 26(f) discovery plan, and to confer as required by Fed. 5 R. Civ. P. 26(f) is made by and between Plaintiff Gary Saperstein and Defendant Greenberg 6 Traurig, LLP (“Defendant”), with respect to the following facts: 7 8 9 10 1. On February 11, 2016, Defendant removed this case from El Dorado Superior Court to this Court. 2. On February 11, 2016, the Court entered an Order Requiring Joint Status Report 11 requiring that, “[w]ithin sixty (60) days of … the date of removal, the parties shall confer as 12 required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and shall prepare and submit to the Court a joint status report 13 that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan.” Dkt. No., ¶4. 14 15 16 17 18 19 3. Sixty days from the date of the removal is April 11, 2016. 4. Defendant is currently in the process of transferring this file from counsel of record, Steptoe & Johnson LLP (“Steptoe”), to new counsel, Jenner & Block LLP (“Jenner”). 5. Counsel of record Michael McNamara and Kirsten Spira are similarly in the process of transitioning from Steptoe to Jenner, and expect that process to be completed by mid- 20 21 22 April 2016. 6. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant met and conferred on March 16, 2016 and 23 agreed that for the convenience of the parties and their counsel of record and to maximize the 24 efficiency of this case in light of the transition to new counsel, the deadlines set forth in the 25 26 27 Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report should be continued three weeks to allow for the transition to new counsel to be completed. 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Doc. # DC-9011964 v.1 1 THEREFORE, ALL PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND RESPECTFULLY 2 REQUEST THAT THE COURT continue the parties’ deadlines to confer as required by Fed. 3 R. Civ. P. 26(f), and prepare and submit to the Court a joint status report that includes the Rule 4 26(f) discovery plan, by three weeks, from April 11, 2016 to May 2, 2016. 5 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP Dated: March 18, 2016 8 9 By: /s/ Kirsten Spira KIRSTEN SPIRA Attorneys for Defendant GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 10 11 12 13 RING HUNTER HOLLAND & SCHENONE LLP Dated: March 18, 2016 14 By: /s/ Justin Schnitzler [as Authorized on March 18, 2016] JUSTIN SCHNITZLER Attorneys for Plaintiff GARRY SAPERSTEIN 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Doc. # DC-9011964 v.1 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/21/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Doc. # DC-9011964 v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?