Ervin v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/15/2017 GRANTING 14 Stipulation for Dismissal; DISMISSING this action with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ELIZABETH A. BROWN (SB# 235429) lisabrown@gbgllp.com AMANDA BOLLIGER CRESPO (SB# 250292) amandacrespo@gbgllp.com GRUBE BROWN & GEIDT LLP 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 1150 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 603-5000 Facsimile: (415) 840-7210 Attorneys for Defendant BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 RYAN M. DAUGHERTY (SBN 279616) LORI MAE DAUGHERTY (SBN 272223) DAUGHERTY & DAUGHERTY P.O. BOX 19115 Sacramento, CA 95819 Telephone: (916) 905-8333 Facsimile: (916) 483-6599 ryan@thedaughertylawfirm.com lori@thedaughertylawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff: GALLANT ERVIN 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 GALLANT ERVIN, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:16-CV-00274-WBS-AC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL vs. BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Dept.: Judge: 5 Hon. William B. Shubb Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No: 2:16-CV-00274-WBS-AC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 The parties to this action, acting through counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this entire action with prejudice, each party to bear his/its own attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: February 15, 2017 DAUGHERTY & DAUGHERTY 5 6 By: /s/ Lori M. Daugherty LORI MAE DAUGHERTY 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff GALLANT ERVIN 8 9 10 DATED: February 15, 2017 GRUBE BROWN & GEIDT LLP 11 By /s/ Elizabeth A. Brown ELIZABETH A. BROWN 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC. 14 15 16 ORDER 17 The stipulation is approved. The entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: February 15, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No: 2:16-CV-00274-WBS-AC -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?