Henry v. Central Freight Lines, Inc.

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/25/2016 ORDERING that the Clerk's Office is directed to remove the unredacted document (Dkt. No. 1-9). Defendant is directed to refile a redacted version of the document. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Spencer C. Skeen CA Bar No. 182216 spencer.skeen@ogletreedeakins.com Tim L. Johnson CA Bar No. 265794 tim.johnson@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 990 San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: 858.652.3100 Facsimile: 858.652.3101 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 12 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK Norman B. Blumenthal CA Bar No. 068687 Kyle R. Nordrehaug CA Bar No. 205975 Aparajit Bhowmik CA Bar No. 248066 Piya Mukherjee CA Bar No. 274217 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, CA 92037 Telephone: (858)551-1223 Facsimile: (858) 551-1232 Website: www.bamlawca.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 11 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 RICKEY HENRY, an individual, on behalf of himself, and on behalf of all 18 persons similarly situated, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 vs. CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., a Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9) AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; ORDER Action Filed: October 20, 2015 Removed: February 23, 2016 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9) AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER RECITALS 1 1. 2 3 On October 20, 2015, Plaintiff Rickey Henry (“Plaintiff”) filed this action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento. 2. 4 On February 11, 2016, Defendant Central Freight Lines, Inc. 5 (“Defendant”) removed this matter to this Court under the Class Action Fairness Act, 6 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). (Dkt. No. 1.) 3. 7 On February 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand to State Court 8 for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and a Motion to Redact Plaintiff’s Personal 9 Information from the Record. (Dkt. No. 7.) 4. 10 After reviewing Plaintiff’s Motion to Redact Plaintiff’s Personal 11 Information from the Record, Defendant’s counsel’s realized they had submitted an 12 unredacted copy of Plaintiff’s Independent Contractor Agreement by mistake. (Dkt. 13 No. 1-9.) 5. 14 On February 24, 2016, Defendant’s counsel asked Plaintiff’s counsel to 15 enter into this Stipulation and Request to Remove Unredacted Document (Dkt. No. 16 1-9) and to Re-File It With Redaction. 17 /// 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9) AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION 1 2 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate and request that this 3 Court strike an unredacted document containing Plaintiff’s personal information that 4 should have been redacted pursuant to Rule 5.2 (Dkt. No. 1-9) and allow Defendant 5 to re-file a redacted version of the document. 6 DATED: February 24, 2016 7 By: /s/ Aparajit Bhowmik Aparajit Bhowmik Piya Mukherjee Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 10 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK DATED: February 24, 2016 11 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By: /s/ Tim L. Johnson Spencer C. Skeen Tim L. Johnson Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 Good cause appearing, the Court hereby approves the Stipulation and Request 17 to Remove Unredacted Document (Dkt. No. 1-9) and to Re-File It With Redaction 18 and orders: 19 20 1. The Clerk’s Office is directed to remove the unredacted document (Dkt. No. 1-9); and 21 2. Defendant is directed to refile a redacted version of the document. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 DATED: 2/25/2016 25 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ JOHN A MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 23968155.1 2 Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9) AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?