Henry v. Central Freight Lines, Inc.
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/25/2016 ORDERING that the Clerk's Office is directed to remove the unredacted document (Dkt. No. 1-9). Defendant is directed to refile a redacted version of the document. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
Spencer C. Skeen CA Bar No. 182216
spencer.skeen@ogletreedeakins.com
Tim L. Johnson CA Bar No. 265794
tim.johnson@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 990
San Diego, CA 92122
Telephone: 858.652.3100
Facsimile: 858.652.3101
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7
12
BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK
Norman B. Blumenthal CA Bar No. 068687
Kyle R. Nordrehaug CA Bar No. 205975
Aparajit Bhowmik CA Bar No. 248066
Piya Mukherjee CA Bar No. 274217
2255 Calle Clara
La Jolla, CA 92037
Telephone: (858)551-1223
Facsimile: (858) 551-1232
Website: www.bamlawca.com
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
10
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
RICKEY HENRY, an individual, on
behalf of himself, and on behalf of all
18
persons similarly situated,
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
24
vs.
CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., a
Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50,
Inclusive,
Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO
REMOVE UNREDACTED
DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9) AND TO
RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION;
ORDER
Action Filed: October 20, 2015
Removed: February 23, 2016
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9)
AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
RECITALS
1
1.
2
3
On October 20, 2015, Plaintiff Rickey Henry (“Plaintiff”) filed this
action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento.
2.
4
On February 11, 2016, Defendant Central Freight Lines, Inc.
5
(“Defendant”) removed this matter to this Court under the Class Action Fairness Act,
6
28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). (Dkt. No. 1.)
3.
7
On February 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand to State Court
8
for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and a Motion to Redact Plaintiff’s Personal
9
Information from the Record. (Dkt. No. 7.)
4.
10
After reviewing Plaintiff’s Motion to Redact Plaintiff’s Personal
11
Information from the Record, Defendant’s counsel’s realized they had submitted an
12
unredacted copy of Plaintiff’s Independent Contractor Agreement by mistake. (Dkt.
13
No. 1-9.)
5.
14
On February 24, 2016, Defendant’s counsel asked Plaintiff’s counsel to
15
enter into this Stipulation and Request to Remove Unredacted Document (Dkt. No.
16
1-9) and to Re-File It With Redaction.
17
///
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9)
AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
STIPULATION
1
2
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate and request that this
3
Court strike an unredacted document containing Plaintiff’s personal information that
4
should have been redacted pursuant to Rule 5.2 (Dkt. No. 1-9) and allow Defendant
5
to re-file a redacted version of the document.
6
DATED: February 24, 2016
7
By: /s/ Aparajit Bhowmik
Aparajit Bhowmik
Piya Mukherjee
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
9
10
BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG &
BHOWMIK
DATED: February 24, 2016
11
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
By: /s/ Tim L. Johnson
Spencer C. Skeen
Tim L. Johnson
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
Good cause appearing, the Court hereby approves the Stipulation and Request
17
to Remove Unredacted Document (Dkt. No. 1-9) and to Re-File It With Redaction
18
and orders:
19
20
1.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to remove the unredacted document (Dkt.
No. 1-9); and
21
2.
Defendant is directed to refile a redacted version of the document.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24 DATED: 2/25/2016
25
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
JOHN A MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
23968155.1
2
Case No. 2:16-cv-00280-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO REMOVE UNREDACTED DOCUMENT (DKT. NO. 1-9)
AND TO RE-FILE IT WITH REDACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?