Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/30/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time of (7) days up through and including 9/6/2016 in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment; and Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before 10/6/2016. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 4 5 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 6 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 VERONIKA A. LANE, 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 20 21 Defendant. ) Case No: 2:16-cv-00301-CMK ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 22 23 Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that: (1) 24 Plaintiff shall have a second extension of time of (7) days up through and including Monday, 25 September 6, 2016 in which to e-file her Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant shall 26 file any opposition, including cross-motions, on or before October 6, 2016. This extension is 27 necessitated by the number of cases (6) the firm presently has pending before this and other 28 district courts that require briefing. 1 Dated: August 29, 2016 /s/Harvey P. Sackett HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff VERONIKA A. LANE 2 3 4 5 PHILLIP A. TALBERT Acting United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 6 7 8 9 Dated: August 29, 2016 /s/MARCELO ILLARMO MARCELO ILLARMO Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: August 30, 2016 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?