Olic v. Booth

Filing 12

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/16 RECOMMENDING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MILORAD OLIC,

12

No. 2:16-cv-0307 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. BOOTH, et al.,

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
By an order filed March 23, 2016, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the

17
18

court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That

19

thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

20
21

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

22
23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

25

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

26

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

2

Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 3, 2016

4
5
/olic0307.fusm

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2