Kersten v. State of California Franchise Tax Board, et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/18/16 ORDERING that, because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the matter is REFERRED BACK to the assigned District Judge. The 06/22/16 scheduling/status conference is VACATED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

TIMOTHY A. KERSTEN,

9
10
11

No. 2:16-CV-0309-JAM-CMK

Plaintiff,
vs.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD., et al.,

12
Defendants.
13
/
14
15

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. At the

16

time the action was filed, plaintiff was proceeding pro se and the matter was referred to the

17

undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). Because plaintiff

18

is now represented by counsel, the matter is referred back to the assigned District Judge. See id.

19

The scheduling/status conference currently set for June 22, 2016, in Redding, California, is

20

hereby vacated.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25

DATED: May 18, 2016
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
1