Eure v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/27/16 ORDERING this case is STAYED until 1/17/17. The Parties will inform the Court of any settlement that is reached within this time. If no settlement is reached, the Parties will confer and will submit a joint status report that includes discovery plan by 1/17/17.(Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 TIM EURE, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC., a Corporation; RYDER DEDICATED LOGISTICS, INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Case No. 16-cv-00324-MCE-AC Assigned to the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF STAY TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO PURSUE MEDIATION Filed: April 20, 2015 Removed: February 17, 2016 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 Pursuant to Plaintiff TIM EURE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants RYDER 24 INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC. and RYDER DEDICATED LOGISTICS, INC. 25 (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) Stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE 26 APPEARING, the Court ORDERS as follows: 27 1. 28 2. This case is STAYED until January 17, 2017; The Parties will inform the Court of any settlement that is reached –1– ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF STAY TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO PURSUE MEDIATION 1 2 within this time; and 3. If no settlement is reached, the Parties will confer as required by Fed. 3 R. Civ. P. 26(f) and will submit a joint status report that includes the 4 Rule 26(f) discovery plan no later than January 17, 2017. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: September 27, 2016 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 –2– ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF STAY TO ALLOW THE PARTIES TO PURSUE MEDIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?