Guinn v. Sugar Transport of the Northwest, Inc.

Filing 109

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/7/18: Final Pretrial Conference continued to 12/3/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Hearing as to 90 Motion for Summary Judgment moved to 10/29/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DOWNEY BRAND LLP CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI (Bar No. 204277) KATIE L. PATTERSON (Bar No. 266023) 621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-4731 Telephone: (916) 444-1000 Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 cferrannini@downeybrand.com kpatterson@downeybrand.com Attorneys for Defendant SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE NORTHWEST, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 12 RYAN GUINN, an individual, on behalf of himself, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 v. Case No. 2:16-cv-00325-WBS-EFB CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE NORTHWEST, INC.; BRONCO WINE COMPANY, a California corporation; CLASSIC WINES OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, a California corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. 19 Plaintiff, RYAN GUINN (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE 20 21 NORTHWEST, INC. (“Sugar Transport”), (hereafter, when referenced in a collective manner, 22 Plaintiff and Sugar Transport will be referred as “the Parties”), by and through their respective 23 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on June 17, 2016, the Court entered a scheduling order, titled “Status 24 25 (Pretrial Scheduling) Order” Document 22; WHEREAS, on February 24, 2017, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled “Stipulation 26 27 and Order Extending Scheduling Order,” Document 61, revising the Scheduling Order in this 28 Case; 1 1530700.3 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES 1 WHEREAS, on May 17, 2017, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled “Stipulation and 2 Order Further Amending Scheduling Order and Extending Scheduling Date for Filing Motion for 3 Class Certification,” Document 69, further revising the scheduling order in this Case; 4 WHEREAS, on November 30, 2017, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled 5 “Stipulation and Order Amending Scheduling Order” Document 77, further revising the 6 scheduling order in this Case setting forth certain dates and deadlines in this action; WHEREAS on May 23, 2018, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled “Stipulation and 7 8 Order for Extension of Deadlines” Document 96, further revising the scheduling order in this 9 Case setting forth certain dates and deadlines in this action; WHEREAS, on July 9, 2018, the Court heard a joint motion filed by Plaintiff and 11 Defendants Bronco Wine Company and Classic Wines of California (collectively as “Bronco”) to 12 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 10 approve the settlement reached by and between them; 13 14 WHEREAS, on or about July 13, 2018, the Court granted the motion to approve the settlement, in part, and ordered Bronco dismissed from this Case with prejudice; 15 WHEREAS, on or about August 10, 2018, the Parties and Bronco agreed to a broad 16 outline of a settlement but have yet to finalize an agreement memorializing all of the material 17 terms of the settlement. Through this proposed agreement, the Parties and Bronco not only intend 18 to memorialize the terms upon which Plaintiff and Sugar Transport have agreed to resolve the 19 remaining issues in this Case and also set forth the terms upon which they, and Bronco, have 20 agreed to resolve six related state court actions, all of which were brought against Sugar 21 Transport and Bronco. 22 WHEREAS, though the Parties are working diligently to finalize the agreement, it has not 23 yet occurred, though they reasonably expect each and all of the terms thereof will be agreed to 24 shortly and, thereafter, will be placed into the agreement; 25 WHEREAS, once the material terms of the settlement agreement are agreed to and the 26 agreement is then signed, because some of Plaintiff’s claims are subject to the Fair Labor 27 Standards Act, the attorneys for Plaintiff and Sugar Transport reasonably believe they will have to 28 obtain approval of the proposed settlement from this Court; 2 1530700.3 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES 1 WHEREAS, given that the Parties need more time to finalize the settlement agreement 2 and then to obtain this Court’s approval for that agreement, the Parties believe it is appropriate to 3 move: (1) the hearing date for the currently pending motion for summary judgment; and (2) the 4 Pre-Trial conference date. Any further litigation of this matter will only increase the costs of 5 litigation for the Parties and burden on this Court. 6 THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to move the hearing date on the 7 motion for summary judgment and modify the “Stipulation and Order Amending Scheduling 8 Order,” Document 96, as follows: 9 STIPULATION 10 1) The hearing date for Sugar Transport’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication shall be moved from September 17, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. to 12 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 11 October 29, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. The briefing schedule will follow the new hearing date; and 13 2) The Final Pretrial Conference shall be continued from to November 19, 2018 at 14 1:30 p.m. to December 3, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 DATED: September 7, 2018 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 17 18 By: 19 20 21 22 DATED: September 6, 2018 /s/ Cassandra M. Ferrannini CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI KATIE L. PATTERSON Attorney for Defendant SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE NORTHWEST, INC. PAGANO & KASS, APC. 23 24 By: /s/ James L. Pagano (as authorized on 9/06/18) JAMES L. PAGANO IAN A. KASS Attorney for Plaintiff RYAN GUINN 25 26 27 28 3 1530700.3 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES 1 ORDER 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that: 3 1) The hearing date for Sugar Transport’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the 4 Alternative Summary Adjudication shall be moved from September 17, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. to 5 October 29, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. The briefing schedule will follow the new hearing date; and 6 7 2) The Final Pretrial Conference shall be continued from to November 19, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. to December 3, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: September 7, 2018 11 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1530700.3 STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?