Guinn v. Sugar Transport of the Northwest, Inc.
Filing
109
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/7/18: Final Pretrial Conference continued to 12/3/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Hearing as to 90 Motion for Summary Judgment moved to 10/29/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI (Bar No. 204277)
KATIE L. PATTERSON (Bar No. 266023)
621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814-4731
Telephone: (916) 444-1000
Facsimile:
(916) 444-2100
cferrannini@downeybrand.com
kpatterson@downeybrand.com
Attorneys for Defendant
SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE NORTHWEST, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
12
RYAN GUINN, an individual, on behalf of
himself, and on behalf of all other persons
similarly situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-00325-WBS-EFB
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
DEADLINES
SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE
NORTHWEST, INC.; BRONCO WINE
COMPANY, a California corporation;
CLASSIC WINES OF CALIFORNIA, a
California corporation, a California
corporation, and DOES 1 through 100,
Defendants.
19
Plaintiff, RYAN GUINN (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant, SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE
20
21
NORTHWEST, INC. (“Sugar Transport”), (hereafter, when referenced in a collective manner,
22
Plaintiff and Sugar Transport will be referred as “the Parties”), by and through their respective
23
attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2016, the Court entered a scheduling order, titled “Status
24
25
(Pretrial Scheduling) Order” Document 22;
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2017, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled “Stipulation
26
27
and Order Extending Scheduling Order,” Document 61, revising the Scheduling Order in this
28
Case;
1
1530700.3
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
1
WHEREAS, on May 17, 2017, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled “Stipulation and
2
Order Further Amending Scheduling Order and Extending Scheduling Date for Filing Motion for
3
Class Certification,” Document 69, further revising the scheduling order in this Case;
4
WHEREAS, on November 30, 2017, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled
5
“Stipulation and Order Amending Scheduling Order” Document 77, further revising the
6
scheduling order in this Case setting forth certain dates and deadlines in this action;
WHEREAS on May 23, 2018, the Court entered a stipulated order, titled “Stipulation and
7
8
Order for Extension of Deadlines” Document 96, further revising the scheduling order in this
9
Case setting forth certain dates and deadlines in this action;
WHEREAS, on July 9, 2018, the Court heard a joint motion filed by Plaintiff and
11
Defendants Bronco Wine Company and Classic Wines of California (collectively as “Bronco”) to
12
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
10
approve the settlement reached by and between them;
13
14
WHEREAS, on or about July 13, 2018, the Court granted the motion to approve the
settlement, in part, and ordered Bronco dismissed from this Case with prejudice;
15
WHEREAS, on or about August 10, 2018, the Parties and Bronco agreed to a broad
16
outline of a settlement but have yet to finalize an agreement memorializing all of the material
17
terms of the settlement. Through this proposed agreement, the Parties and Bronco not only intend
18
to memorialize the terms upon which Plaintiff and Sugar Transport have agreed to resolve the
19
remaining issues in this Case and also set forth the terms upon which they, and Bronco, have
20
agreed to resolve six related state court actions, all of which were brought against Sugar
21
Transport and Bronco.
22
WHEREAS, though the Parties are working diligently to finalize the agreement, it has not
23
yet occurred, though they reasonably expect each and all of the terms thereof will be agreed to
24
shortly and, thereafter, will be placed into the agreement;
25
WHEREAS, once the material terms of the settlement agreement are agreed to and the
26
agreement is then signed, because some of Plaintiff’s claims are subject to the Fair Labor
27
Standards Act, the attorneys for Plaintiff and Sugar Transport reasonably believe they will have to
28
obtain approval of the proposed settlement from this Court;
2
1530700.3
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
1
WHEREAS, given that the Parties need more time to finalize the settlement agreement
2
and then to obtain this Court’s approval for that agreement, the Parties believe it is appropriate to
3
move: (1) the hearing date for the currently pending motion for summary judgment; and (2) the
4
Pre-Trial conference date. Any further litigation of this matter will only increase the costs of
5
litigation for the Parties and burden on this Court.
6
THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to move the hearing date on the
7
motion for summary judgment and modify the “Stipulation and Order Amending Scheduling
8
Order,” Document 96, as follows:
9
STIPULATION
10
1)
The hearing date for Sugar Transport’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the
Alternative Summary Adjudication shall be moved from September 17, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. to
12
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
11
October 29, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. The briefing schedule will follow the new hearing date; and
13
2)
The Final Pretrial Conference shall be continued from to November 19, 2018 at
14
1:30 p.m. to December 3, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
DATED: September 7, 2018
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
17
18
By:
19
20
21
22
DATED: September 6, 2018
/s/ Cassandra M. Ferrannini
CASSANDRA M. FERRANNINI
KATIE L. PATTERSON
Attorney for Defendant
SUGAR TRANSPORT OF THE NORTHWEST,
INC.
PAGANO & KASS, APC.
23
24
By:
/s/ James L. Pagano (as authorized on 9/06/18)
JAMES L. PAGANO
IAN A. KASS
Attorney for Plaintiff
RYAN GUINN
25
26
27
28
3
1530700.3
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
1
ORDER
2
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that:
3
1)
The hearing date for Sugar Transport’s Motion for Summary Judgment or in the
4
Alternative Summary Adjudication shall be moved from September 17, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. to
5
October 29, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. The briefing schedule will follow the new hearing date; and
6
7
2)
The Final Pretrial Conference shall be continued from to November 19, 2018 at
1:30 p.m. to December 3, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: September 7, 2018
11
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1530700.3
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?