Bivins v. Ju et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/9/2017 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 27 motion for settlement conference. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH BIVINS, 12 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0389 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. JU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On May 13, 2017, plaintiff signed a 18 request for settlement conference. (ECF No. 27.) However, in light of defendant Dr. Ju’s motion 19 to opt out of the post-screening ADR project, it appears that a settlement conference at this time is 20 not warranted. (See ECF No. 25.) No good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for a settlement 21 conference is denied. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for settlement conference 23 (ECF No. 27) is denied without prejudice. 24 Dated: June 9, 2017 25 26 27 28 /biv0389.den 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?