Bivins v. Ju et al

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/9/2017 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 27 motion for settlement conference. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSEPH BIVINS,

12
13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0389 MCE KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

DR. JU, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On May 13, 2017, plaintiff signed a

18

request for settlement conference. (ECF No. 27.) However, in light of defendant Dr. Ju’s motion

19

to opt out of the post-screening ADR project, it appears that a settlement conference at this time is

20

not warranted. (See ECF No. 25.) No good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for a settlement

21

conference is denied.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for settlement conference

23

(ECF No. 27) is denied without prejudice.

24

Dated: June 9, 2017

25
26
27
28

/biv0389.den

1