Stribling v. Mott et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/14/16 ORDERING that this Action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AARON STRIBLING,
12
No. 2:16-cv-0400 CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
R. MOTT, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
17
18
1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings
19
in this action. (ECF No. 5.)
On April 5, 2016, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and he was granted thirty days to
20
21
file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the
22
screening order. (ECF No. 9.) On May 5, 2016, the court denied that motion and granted
23
plaintiff an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was
24
advised that failure to timely amend would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) The thirty days
25
has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
2
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
Dated: June 14, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
2/stri0400.fta
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?