Stribling v. Mott et al
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/27/19 DENYING 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of Local Rule 260. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AARON LAMONT STRIBLING,
12
No. 2:16-cv-0400 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
R. MOTT, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
17
18
§ 1983, has filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 93.) However, the motion fails to
19
comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 260 and will be denied without
20
prejudice to a motion in the proper form. The court also notes that it is unclear whether plaintiff
21
has complied with the August 29, 2018 order compelling discovery responses. Plaintiff is
22
cautioned that he must comply with the August 29, 2018 order prior to filing any further motion
23
for summary judgment because his responses to defendants’ discovery requests may provide
24
defendants with information necessary to defend against a summary judgment motion.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 93) is denied without prejudice to
27
bringing a motion in the proper form.
28
////
1
1
2
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of Local Rule 260.
Dated: February 27, 2019
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
3
4
5
6
13:stri0400.msj.deny
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?