Stribling v. Mott et al

Filing 94

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 02/27/19 DENYING 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of Local Rule 260. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON LAMONT STRIBLING, 12 No. 2:16-cv-0400 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 R. MOTT, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 18 § 1983, has filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 93.) However, the motion fails to 19 comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 260 and will be denied without 20 prejudice to a motion in the proper form. The court also notes that it is unclear whether plaintiff 21 has complied with the August 29, 2018 order compelling discovery responses. Plaintiff is 22 cautioned that he must comply with the August 29, 2018 order prior to filing any further motion 23 for summary judgment because his responses to defendants’ discovery requests may provide 24 defendants with information necessary to defend against a summary judgment motion. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 93) is denied without prejudice to 27 bringing a motion in the proper form. 28 //// 1 1 2 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of Local Rule 260. Dated: February 27, 2019 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 13:stri0400.msj.deny 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?