Englehart et al. v. St. Anton Building, LP et al.

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/9/16 ORDERING that Third-Party Defendant TKE shall have an additional 14 days up to and including June 27, 2016 to respond to Third-Party Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FLETCHER C. ALFORD (SBN: 152314) falford@gordonrees.com RYAN B. POLK (SBN: 230769) rpolk@gordonrees.com DANIEL S. KUBASAK (SBN: 222336) dkubasak@gordonrees.com GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendant THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION 8 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 13 CHRISTOPHER F. WOHL (SBN: 170280) BAILEY K. BIFOSS (SBN: 278392) PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON LLP 2277 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 455 Sacramento, Ca 95825 Telephone: (916) 442-3552 Facsimile: (916) 640-1521 Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs ST. ANTON BUILDING, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; ST. ANTON MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT, INC. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 JOHN KERR; and KRYSTLE ENGLEHART, 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, v. ST. ANTON BUILDING, LP, a California limited partnership; ST. ANTON MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT, INC.; and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 AND RELATED ACTIONS. 25 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00414-WBS-AC STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Third-Party Defendant ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation (“TKE”) and Defendants and 2 Third-Party Plaintiffs St. Anton Building, LP, a California limited partnership and St. Anton 3 Multifamily Management, Inc. (collectively “Third-Party Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate to extend 4 the time of Third-Party Defendant TKE to respond to Third-Party Plaintiffs’ Complaint by 5 fourteen days, up to and including June 27, 2016: 6 7 8 9 10 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 1. WHEREAS, Third-Party Plaintiffs filed their Third-Party Complaint on May 13, 2016; 2. WHEREAS, Third-Party Defendant TKE was served with the Third-Party Complaint on May 23, 2016; 3. WHEREAS, Third-Party Defendant TKE presently must respond to the Third-Party Complaint on or before June 13, 2016; 4. WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Third-Party Plaintiffs have agreed to extend 13 the time for Third-Party Defendant TKE to respond to the Third-Party Complaint by 14 fourteen (14) days – up to, and including, June 27, 2016; 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and through their respective 16 undersigned counsel, that Third-Party Defendant TKE shall have an additional fourteen (14) 17 days up to and including June 27, 2016 to respond to Third-Party Plaintiffs’ Complaint. 18 Dated: June 8, 2016 GORDON & REES LLP 19 20 By: 21 22 23 /s/ Daniel S. Kubasak Fletcher C. Alford Ryan B. Polk Daniel S. Kubasak Attorneys for Defendant THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: June 8, 2016 PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 6 7 8 9 /s/ Bailey K. Bifoss Christopher F. Wohl Bailey K. Bifoss Attorneys for Defendants and ThirdParty Plaintiffs ST. ANTON BUILDING, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; ST. ANTON MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT, INC. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: June 9, 2016 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1119547/28294859v.1 -3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?