Englehart et al. v. St. Anton Building, LP et al.
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/9/16 ORDERING that Third-Party Defendant TKE shall have an additional 14 days up to and including June 27, 2016 to respond to Third-Party Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
FLETCHER C. ALFORD (SBN: 152314)
falford@gordonrees.com
RYAN B. POLK (SBN: 230769)
rpolk@gordonrees.com
DANIEL S. KUBASAK (SBN: 222336)
dkubasak@gordonrees.com
GORDON & REES LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
Attorneys for Defendant
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION
8
9
10
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
12
13
CHRISTOPHER F. WOHL (SBN: 170280)
BAILEY K. BIFOSS (SBN: 278392)
PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON LLP
2277 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 455
Sacramento, Ca 95825
Telephone: (916) 442-3552
Facsimile: (916) 640-1521
Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs
ST. ANTON BUILDING, LP, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; ST. ANTON
MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT, INC.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
JOHN KERR; and KRYSTLE ENGLEHART,
19
20
21
22
Plaintiffs,
v.
ST. ANTON BUILDING, LP, a California limited
partnership; ST. ANTON MULTIFAMILY
MANAGEMENT, INC.; and DOES 1 through 25,
inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24
AND RELATED ACTIONS.
25
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00414-WBS-AC
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY
DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP
ELEVATOR CORPORATION TO
RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Third-Party Defendant ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation (“TKE”) and Defendants and
2
Third-Party Plaintiffs St. Anton Building, LP, a California limited partnership and St. Anton
3
Multifamily Management, Inc. (collectively “Third-Party Plaintiffs”) hereby stipulate to extend
4
the time of Third-Party Defendant TKE to respond to Third-Party Plaintiffs’ Complaint by
5
fourteen days, up to and including June 27, 2016:
6
7
8
9
10
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
12
1. WHEREAS, Third-Party Plaintiffs filed their Third-Party Complaint on May 13,
2016;
2. WHEREAS, Third-Party Defendant TKE was served with the Third-Party Complaint
on May 23, 2016;
3. WHEREAS, Third-Party Defendant TKE presently must respond to the Third-Party
Complaint on or before June 13, 2016;
4. WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, Third-Party Plaintiffs have agreed to extend
13
the time for Third-Party Defendant TKE to respond to the Third-Party Complaint by
14
fourteen (14) days – up to, and including, June 27, 2016;
15
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and through their respective
16
undersigned counsel, that Third-Party Defendant TKE shall have an additional fourteen (14)
17
days up to and including June 27, 2016 to respond to Third-Party Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
18
Dated: June 8, 2016
GORDON & REES LLP
19
20
By:
21
22
23
/s/ Daniel S. Kubasak
Fletcher C. Alford
Ryan B. Polk
Daniel S. Kubasak
Attorneys for Defendant
THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
CORPORATION
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Dated: June 8, 2016
PALMER KAZANJIAN WOHL HODSON
LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Bailey K. Bifoss
Christopher F. Wohl
Bailey K. Bifoss
Attorneys for Defendants and ThirdParty Plaintiffs
ST. ANTON BUILDING, LP, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP; ST. ANTON
MULTIFAMILY MANAGEMENT,
INC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated: June 9, 2016
Gordon & Rees LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1119547/28294859v.1
-3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?