Mosley v. Beard et al

Filing 21

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/30/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CARLTON V. MOSLEY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-0420 MCE AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal

18

service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that

19

a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-

20

three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has

21

failed to notify the Court of a current address.

22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. See L.R. 183(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: May 30, 2019

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2