Stewart v. Romero et al
Filing
27
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/19/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD STEWART,
12
No. 2:16-cv-0447 KJM CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ROMERO, et al.,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
On May 31, 2017, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court the USM-
17
18
285 forms necessary to effect service on five defendants. The time allotted to comply with the
19
terms of the court’s May 31, 2017 order has expired and plaintiff has not filed anything
20
explaining his failure to comply. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this
21
action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
22
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
24
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
25
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
26
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
2
Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: September 19, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
stew0447.fusm(2)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?