Wydner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/16/2016 ORDERING that the time for Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment or Remand is EXTENDED to 9/15/2016. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Jared T. Walker (SB#269029) 2020 Capitol Avenue Suite 7 Sacramento, CA 95811 T: (916) 476-5044 F: (916) 476-5064 jared@saclawoffices.com Attorney for Plaintiff, DAWN WYDNER 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAWN WYDNER, real party in interest on behalf of GREGORY J. WYDNER, Case No.: 2: 16-cv-00458-KJM- CMK 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF 12 13 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 16 IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 17 that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) 18 days until September 15, 2016. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of time. Despite due 19 diligence, Plaintiff’s counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff’s opening brief in accordance with 20 the current scheduling order due to counsel’s current workload which has involved conflicting 21 deadlines in unrelated matters. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF 1 Dated: August 12, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 2 /s/ Jared T. Walker Jared T. Walker, Attorney for Plaintiff 3 4 SO STIPULATED: PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 5 6 7 Dated: August 12, 2016 8 9 By: /s/ *Jeffrey T. Chen (*authorized by e-mail on 8/12/2016) Jeffrey T. Chen Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 10 ORDER 11 12 13 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 14 15 Dated: August 16, 2016 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?