Wilkins v. Macomber et al
Filing
99
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/07/23 DENYING 96 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 93 12/30/22 Order. No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
KEENAN WILKINS, also known as
Nerrah Brown,
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-00475-TLN-DMC
JEFF MACOMBER, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 96, for reconsideration of
20
the Magistrate Judge’s December 30, 2022, order.
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s order
21
22
shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the
23
Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or
24
contrary to law. The December 30, 2022, order is, therefore, affirmed.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Motion for Reconsideration, (ECF No. 96), is DENIED;
3
2.
The Magistrate Judge’s December 30, 2022, Order is AFFIRMED; and
4
3.
No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered.
5
DATE: February 7, 2023
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?