Wilkins v. Macomber et al

Filing 99

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/07/23 DENYING 96 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING 93 12/30/22 Order. No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 KEENAN WILKINS, also known as Nerrah Brown, Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-00475-TLN-DMC JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 96, for reconsideration of 20 the Magistrate Judge’s December 30, 2022, order. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s order 21 22 shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the 23 Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or 24 contrary to law. The December 30, 2022, order is, therefore, affirmed. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Motion for Reconsideration, (ECF No. 96), is DENIED; 3 2. The Magistrate Judge’s December 30, 2022, Order is AFFIRMED; and 4 3. No further motions for reconsideration of this Order will be considered. 5 DATE: February 7, 2023 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?