Pierce v. Obama

Filing 9

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/29/16 Recommending that this Action be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Seavon Pierce. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAVON PIERCE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-0502 JAM CKD P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BARACK OBAMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On April 4, 2016, plaintiff, a Three Strikes litigant, was ordered to pay the filing fee 17 18 within fourteen days or face dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 7.) That period has now expired, 19 and plaintiff has filed objections to the order denying in forma pauperis status, but not paid the 20 filing fee. Plaintiff’s objections are without merit. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 22 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings 27 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 28 //// 1 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: April 29, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 / pier0502.1915(g) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?