Golden v. State Military Department National Guard, State of California, et al
Filing
14
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/14/16. The United States is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice. Considering the case now involves a state law claim against state law defendants, defendants are hereby ordered to show cause within fourteen (14) days why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of jurisdiction. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHELLE GOLDEN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-00507-KJM-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
STATE MILITARY DEPARTMENT
NATIONAL GUARD, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al,
16
Defendants.
17
18
On December 22, 2015, plaintiff filed a wrongful death claim in Sacramento
19
20
Superior Court. ECF No. 1-1. On March 10, 2016, the case was removed to this federal court on
21
the basis of 28 U.S.C. ยง 2679(d)(2), because defendants Laura Yeager, Nadar Araj, and Donald
22
Engel allegedly were acting within the course and scope of their federal employment at all times
23
material to the allegations in the complaint. ECF No. 1. On March 11, 2016, the United States
24
was substituted into this action, thereby terminating Yeager, Araj, and Engel from the case. See
25
ECF No. 4.
26
On March 30, 2016, plaintiff and the United States stipulated to dismiss the United
27
States from this action. ECF No. 8. This left as defendants Richard Rabe, Charlotte Clark and
28
Rebecca Lorera, officers of the California Department of Justice. ECF No. 11. In the stipulation
1
1
of dismissal, plaintiff requested the court remand this case to state court; the United States took
2
no position on remand. ECF No. 8.
3
The United States is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice.
4
Considering the case now involves a state law claim against state law defendants,
5
defendants are hereby ordered to show cause within fourteen (14) days why this case should not
6
be remanded to state court for lack of jurisdiction.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 14, 2016
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?