Sekona v. Custino, et al.
Filing
101
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/04/19 ORDERING defendants request to conduct Plaintiff Etuate Sekonas deposition via videoconference 100 is granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ETUATE SEKONA,
Case No. 2:16-cv-0517-JAM-DMC-P
12
Plaintiff, ORDER
13
v.
14
15
F. CUSTINO, et al.,
16
Plaintiffs.
17
18
Defendants’ request to conduct Plaintiff Etuate Sekona’s deposition via videoconference is
19
granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is
20
housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
21
22
Dated: February 4, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order (2:16-cv--0517-JAM-DMC-P)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?