Sekona v. Custino, et al.

Filing 101

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 02/04/19 ORDERING defendants request to conduct Plaintiff Etuate Sekonas deposition via videoconference 100 is granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, Case No. 2:16-cv-0517-JAM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 F. CUSTINO, et al., 16 Plaintiffs. 17 18 Defendants’ request to conduct Plaintiff Etuate Sekona’s deposition via videoconference is 19 granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is 20 housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. 21 22 Dated: February 4, 2019 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order (2:16-cv--0517-JAM-DMC-P)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?