Sekona v. Custino, et al.
Filing
166
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/7/2020 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 9/10/2020, in full; and DENYING Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF No. 154 .(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ETUATE SEKONA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-CV-0517-JAM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
F. CUSTINO,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On September 10, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. Timely objections to the findings and
23
recommendations have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
25
304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
26
entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed September 10, 2020, are adopted
2.
Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF No. 154, is
3
in full; and
4
5
denied.
6
7
8
9
DATED: December 7, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?